We have seen the enemy
But let's talk about Michael Curtis Reynolds, of Wilkes Barre, PA, for a moment. Now with delicious updates! He first crossed my radar about a month ago when everyone got their panties in a bunch when the government subpoenaed his Hotmail account. Without much more information to go on, it seemed like a big ol' violation of civil liberties. But now, as it turns out, the reason his email was subpoenaed is because he's been busted for allegedly trying to collaborate with Al-Qaeda to bomb the Alaskan pipeline. According to the CIA, he sought funding for this mission on a number of militant Islamic message boards and fell into a sting operation that was masterminded by a judge in Montana who poses as an Al Qaeda operative--just for fun. He needed $40,000. The day he was arrested, Reynolds’ net worth was $24.85. From the article: Authorities said Reynolds’ letters, computer drawings and e-mails spelled out his plot to detonate trucks filled with propane along the Alaskan pipeline. This included “information on explosive devices, site plans and placement of explosive devices.” He also allegedly planned to blow up sections of the Transcontinental Pipeline, a natural-gas pipeline that runs from the Gulf Coast, through Pennsylvania, to New Jersey and New York City.What's Reynolds' rebuttal to all this? "He claimed he was trying to lure this terrorist group in," [Assistant U.S. Attorney] Gurganus reportedly said in court. It's a pretty spurious claim, given Reynolds' checkered past. He seems the perfect portrait of a crazy dude: failed soldier of fortune, delusions of grandeur, wanted to build a castle, had a van full of electronics and owned guns and grenades. Lived with mom. Menacing and attempted arson convictions. Paintball enthusiast. According to his ex-father-in-law, a "John Wayne wanna-be." But still, c'mon folks. Here's a guy who has very limited knowledge of Islam, of terrorist organizations, and of the Alaskan pipeline. The guy spent most of his time--when he wasn't caring for his legless mother--messing around with a van that was mostly parked in front of his house. That's not even the most interesting part of this story. Let's look at Shannen Rossmiller, the Montana judge who caught this American jihadist. She first gained notoriety for catching National Guardsman Ryan Anderson, who in 2004 was convicted of attempted espionage. How did this woman become such an expert on tracking down terrorists on American soil? Well, according to this article, "Rossmiller began trolling the Internet for potential terrorists after Sept. 11, 2001. Stunned and angered by the attacks on the United States, Rossmiller read the Koran, studied radical Islamic culture, and learned enough Arabic to lurk in chat rooms and ensnare jihadists....She had fractured her pelvis after slipping in the tub, and the convalescence afforded her the time to start her new avocation." Would that we all had this much time on our hands. Interestingly enough, when you dig a little bit deeper, you come across stuff like this, a reprint of a Seattle Times article. Rossmiller is apparently part of a group of web Nobody in 7Seas speaks Arabic, and Rossmiller might spend weeks translating a posting using software and a dictionary [Ed note: Huh, I thought she taught herself Arabic while she was laid up?].....The details of the personalities she assumes are just as painstakingly assembled. Their street addresses are real. She knows the address of the nearest mosque and the name of its imam. A message pops up on her computer to remind her when it would be prayer time, so she remembers to stop what she's doing....She has software that "proxies" her computer address to that area, making it appear to all but the most savvy Internet user that she's physically there. It helps that her husband, Randy, is a computer technician....Rossmiller spends hours researching the philosophical underpinnings of terrorist groups. If she were a Kashmir radical, she points out, her motivations would differ from those of a Saudi Arabian or Afghan....Her postings can be brazen. Rossmiller says the goal is to flush out terrorists, and being timid or obtuse doesn't get it done.In this interview with Rossmiller here, she adds "Some helpful skills that a person should possess for doing internet counterintelligence work include, but are not limited to: foreign language skills; on going knowledge of terrorist groups and individuals associated with those groups; ability to analyze information for threats and apply critical thinking skills; .... basic word processing skills.... It is not necessary that a person be wholly proficient in all of these skills, as good skills are usually developed “in the field” in my experience."Hmm, what about multitasking? What about the ability to think outside of the box? I should punch up my resume. You should go check out the Wayback Machine's archive of the 7Seas website. It reads a lot more like the "corporate consulting firms" I've copywritten for than a buncha self-styled Elliott Nesses. Interestingly, considering where Rossmiller lives, they have seemingly little interest in the Aryan or patriot movements in America or elsewhere. They mention looking for steganography and coded messages in internet forums, but how is this possible if they have to spend a week at a time translating a single page? (By 2005, they've changed their tune and adopted more buzzwords. E-Jihad! Tactical turnkey control! Someone attended a weekend conference!) So essentially, what she's saying is that she's capable of capturing the most hapless of aspiring terrorists--the next generation of Jose Padillas. How is this at all helpful to us? Is she fooling anyone with this ruse? If you read Jihad for Dummies and use English to Arabic on Babelfish, are you going to suss out anyone but the dumbest of aspiring criminals? I doubt it. Rossmiller and her compadres, as good intentioned as they might be, are wasting the CIA's time, and if anything, Al Qaeda (and whoever else) are aware of this posse comitatus and are steering quite clear of them. The fact that she managed to catch only the most peripheral and hapless of aspiring jihadists out there is proof of this. Of course, I await further developments before I put my final sneering stamp of disapproval on this whole mishegoss. Further developments!
Posted by Dana at 02:19 PM
|
Great summary, Dana. My main question about this whole thing: since the ridiculous woman isn't real law enforcement, couldn't she be considered a collaborator with this sad fellow? An enabler at least? If she's posing as a terrorist, doesn't that make her a suspect?
My overall feeling is that it's very American behavior. The over-estimation of one's abilities, the exaggerated confidence that one is on the side of righteousness, the reliance on tricks rather than on knowledge, and, perhaps most of all, the seeking out of press and gratification for one's supposedly altruistic actions.
Posted by: Grant Barrett at February 13, 2006 09:31 AMMy overall feeling is that it's very American behavior....
Indeed. And it's very similar to the fine, fine work being done by the upstanding citizens at Perverted Justice (an organization I believe is peopled with a whole lot of ladies-who-doth-protest-too-much).
I blame Law & Order.
Posted by: dana at February 13, 2006 10:20 AMThe Perverted Justice thing leapt to my mind too.
These people have found a "socially acceptable" way to live out their hate fantasies.
Posted by: jpoulos at February 13, 2006 11:21 AMSame deal with Lou Dobbs' favorite group, the Minutemen.
Posted by: Vidiot at February 13, 2006 01:41 PMDo you know that your index.xml feed, which conveniently includes the 'links' feed, doesn't actually make any of the links into, well, links?
Well, now you do!
*wanders off into the mists again*
Posted by: stavrosthewonderchicken at February 13, 2006 11:55 PMYeah, I know. I don't have the savvy nor the inclination to fix it, though.
Posted by: dana at February 14, 2006 12:53 AMRidiculous woman? Collaborating with the enemy? You really need to do some research on this American Patriot. She is backed by the FBI, and probably saved the US a devastating blow to the economy. You should thank Shannen that you aren't paying $5 a gallon for gas next time you fuel up.
Posted by: randy at February 15, 2006 10:54 AMYour article makes my wife sound like an out of control vigilante. My wife has been responsible for the capture of hundreds of Islamic extremists (overseas), Reynolds and Anderson are the only ones that have made any kind of news. You pick my wife apart, when all she is trying to do is the right thing. You should be thanking her instead of referring to her as a vigilante, and an angry woman. What have you done for your country lately?
Posted by: randy at February 15, 2006 11:03 AMrandy, I'm going to guess from your email address that you're her husband [edited to add: ah, yes you are--your second comment came in while I was adding this one]--you don't exactly have an impartial opinion here.
I'll say this much: I don't think what your wife is doing is a detriment to the "war on terror." But just this morning there was a report about how, for example, the Iraqi insurgents are gaining in strength, numbers, and cohesion, all because of their communications via listservs and the web and whatnot. So in the big picture, bringing down some yokel who wanted to bomb, in part, a refinery that no longer exists isn't particularly helpful.
('Sides which, I live in NYC, where the gas practically *is* $5 a gallon. )
Posted by: dana at February 15, 2006 11:07 AMIf gas were $5/gallon, or more even--because of a gas tax and not because of OPEC--we wouldn't have this terrorist problem. What we would, or at least could, have instead is better schools and universal healthcare.
Lemme guess, though?: ooooh TAXES. get thee hence, satan.